LegalFirms.in — Know Your Rights
Cheque Bounced? Your Rights and Remedies
A dishonoured cheque is both a criminal offence under Section 138 NI Act and a civil breach. Here's the timeline, your options, and the deadlines that make or break a case.
Governing law: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Sections 138–142)
When a cheque is returned unpaid by the drawer's bank (whether for insufficient funds or account closed), you have both a civil remedy (recovery suit for the debt) and a criminal remedy (Section 138 complaint that can lead to imprisonment up to 2 years or fine up to twice the cheque amount). The criminal remedy has strict, sequential deadlines: you must present the cheque within 3 months of issue, send a demand notice within 30 days of the bank's return memo, wait 15 days from the drawer's receipt of the notice, then file a complaint in court within the next 30 days. Missing any of these deadlines can be fatal to the Section 138 complaint — though the civil recovery suit remains available under the general 3-year limitation period.
Frequently Asked Questions
A cheque given to me bounced. What are the exact timelines?
From the date your bank hands you the return memo: (1) You must send a demand notice within 30 days. (2) The drawer then has 15 days from RECEIPT of the notice (not from the date you sent it) to pay. (3) If they do not pay, you must file a Section 138 complaint in court within the next 30 days. Missing any deadline can be fatal to the criminal case. If you cross the 30-day complaint window, you can still pursue civil recovery within the 3-year limitation period, but you lose the criminal-liability leverage.
Source: Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Sections 138 and 142; K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510
Can I re-present the cheque instead of sending a notice?
Yes — you can re-present the cheque as long as it is still valid (typically 3 months from the date on the cheque). If it bounces again, a fresh 30-day window to send notice starts from the second dishonour. However, the Supreme Court has held that once you send a legal notice after one dishonour, that cause of action is fixed — a second notice on the same cheque after re-presentation is not permitted to reset the clock. So re-present freely BEFORE sending any notice; once you send a notice, the 30/15/30 timeline is locked.
Source: MSR Leathers v. S. Planniappan (2013) 1 SCC 177; Prem Chand Vijay Kumar v. Yashpal Singh (2005) 4 SCC 417
What if the drawer says the cheque was only a security cheque?
Courts have consistently held that even a security cheque can attract Section 138 liability if a legally enforceable debt existed at the time the cheque was presented. The presumption under Section 139 is that a cheque was issued for discharge of a debt, and the burden is on the drawer to rebut this with credible evidence — merely calling it a "security cheque" is not enough. This is a genuine defence in specific circumstances (e.g. the underlying loan was never disbursed, or the debt was fully paid before presentation), but it needs to be proved with evidence.
Source: Rangappa v. Sri Mohan (2010) 11 SCC 441
More on the magazine
Explore related articles in our Know Your Rights collection
In-depth explainers and case commentary on the LegalFirms Magazine.
Educational content, not legal advice. These explainers summarise general legal positions and cite the underlying statutes; they do not replace advice tailored to your specific situation. Consult an advocate for anything you plan to act on.