Headnote
AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioner was arrested on 03.10.2023 in connection with FIR No. 225 registered at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur, under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), arising out of a chance recovery of 71 loose intoxicant injections of Buprenorphine Hydrochloride from his possession, with the FSL report confirming the total weight of 3.988 grams constituting commercial quantity. The petitioner, having clean criminal antecedents, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Although the commercial quantity of the contraband attracted the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the twin conditions thereunder, the High Court took into account the prolonged pre-trial incarceration of the petitioner and the slow progress of trial. Relying upon a series of Supreme Court precedents wherein bail was granted on the ground of extended custody in NDPS matters involving commercial quantities, the Court held that the petitioner had made out a case for bail.
The petition for regular bail was allowed subject to appropriate terms and conditions to be imposed by the Trial Court, with the petitioner being directed to be produced before the Trial Court within a specified period. The petitioner's counsel gave an undertaking that the petitioner would not indulge in offences involving commercial or intermediate quantities or offences falling under Sections 19, 24 or 27A of the NDPS Act, failing which the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail.
Catchwords:
bail
NDPS Act
commercial quantity
Buprenorphine
Section 37 twin conditions
prolonged incarceration
pre-trial custody
chance recovery
FSL report
regular bail
BNSS Section 483
© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain
per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 43, Cited by 0]
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Yuvraj Alias Yuvi vs State Of Punjab on 29 April, 2025
Author: Anoop Chitkara
Bench: Anoop Chitkara
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:056098
CRM-M-42464-2024 -1-
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-42464-2024
Reserved on : 02.04.2025
Pronounced on: 29.04.2025
YUVRAJ ALIAS YUVI ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. M.S.Saini, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Navreet Kaur Barnala, AAG, Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Da
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.