LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sanjeev-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-20241120/ · Printed 20 Sep 2026
Criminal

Sanjeev Kumar vs State Of Haryana

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 November 2024
Case No.
CRM-M-52946-2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Anoop Chitkara J.
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and P §22-C Narcotic Drugs and P §27-A Narcotic Drugs and P §37 CrPC §439
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No. 579 dated 01.11.2023 registered at Police Station Sadar Fatehabad under Sections 22-C and 27-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, alleging that he supplied 65 vials of cough syrup containing Codeine Phosphate and Triprolidine Hydrochloride to co-accused Jaswinder Kaur, and that a further 60 vials along with drug money were recovered pursuant to his disclosure statement. The quantity involved was of a commercial nature, thereby attracting the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, requiring satisfaction of twin conditions before bail could be granted.

The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 CrPC on the ground that prolonged pre-trial incarceration would cause irreversible injustice to him and his family. The High Court, relying on a catena of Supreme Court precedents granting bail in cases of prolonged custody in NDPS matters involving cough syrup containing codeine, held that the period of incarceration already undergone by the petitioner constituted sufficient ground to grant bail notwithstanding the commercial quantity and the statutory embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to stringent conditions, reaffirming the principle that even where commercial quantity of narcotic substance is involved, prolonged pre-trial detention without conclusion of trial can justify the grant of bail, particularly where the accused has no criminal antecedents and the Supreme Court has consistently intervened in analogous fact situations.
Catchwords: NDPS Act bail commercial quantity codeine phosphate cough syrup Section 37 NDPS Act twin conditions prolonged custody Section 439 CrPC disclosure statement no criminal antecedents regular bail

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 37, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court Sanjeev Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 20 November, 2024 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:152370 1 CRM-M-52946-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52946-2024 Reserved on: 07.11.2024 Pronounced on: 20.11.2024 Sanjeev Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Criminal