LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mr-kishan-kumar-thotakura-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-income-tax-20240712/ · Printed 20 Sep 2026
Revenue

Mr. Kishan Kumar Thotakura vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 July 2024
Case No.
Writ Petition Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, 32056, 32074, 32177, 32175, 32156, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740
Result
Disposed
Bench
G. Narendar J. and Hiranmayee Mandava J.
Acts & Sections
Income Tax Act, 1961 §148 Income Tax Act, 1961 §148A Income Tax Act, 1961 §148A(d) Income Tax Act, 1961 §149 Income Tax Act, 1961 §147 Constitution §226
Also reported in
This judgment disposed of connected matters. The same reasons were delivered in the following case.
Smt Prameela Pasumarthi vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Writ Petition Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, 32056, 32074, 32177, 32175, 32156, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
These writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed under Section 148A(d) and notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for various assessment years. The petitioners contended that the impugned orders and notices were arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void ab initio, violative of principles of natural justice, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India as well as Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, constituted by a Division Bench of G. Narendar J. and Hiranmayee Mandava J., took up the batch of writ petitions together as they involved common questions of law pertaining to reassessment proceedings initiated by income tax authorities under the amended provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity and legal sustainability of the reopening/reassessment notices and the preliminary orders passed under Section 148A(d).

The High Court examined the scope of Section 148A and Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, and the conditions precedent for issuance of reassessment notices, including the requirements of supplying information to the assessee and affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing before passing an order under Section 148A(d). The Court considered the law laid down by the Supreme Court and various High Courts on the subject and proceeded to dispose of the petitions with appropriate directions.
Catchwords: Income Tax Reassessment Section 148 Section 148A Finance Act 2021 Notice of Reopening Writ of Mandamus Article 226 Principles of Natural Justice Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution Section 149 limitation Void ab initio Arbitrary orders

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 44, Cited by 0] Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Mr. Kishan Kumar Thotakura, vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 12 July, 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION} FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY GF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR 'PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, S805, $2056, 32074, QQ177, J21FS, SPISG, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740, 33047, 33089, 329279, 39229, 99232, 39647 of 20
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Revenue