Headnote
AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioner (plaintiff) held a licensed shop room of 12,000 sq. ft. in a shopping mall at Palakkad under a license deed dated 26/4/2018 from the respondent (defendant) for running a supermarket. The plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant for alleged interference with his business. The defendant filed a written statement and a counter-claim seeking mandatory injunction to eject the plaintiff on the ground of default in payment of license fee and an alleged admission by the plaintiff to vacate, and also filed IA No. 6/2024 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The trial court dismissed IA No. 6/2024 and directed transfer of both the suit and the counter-claim to the Commercial Court.
The Kerala High Court, in the above Original Petition and Civil Revision Petition challenging the common order of the trial court, addressed two separate issues: the correctness of dismissal of IA No. 6/2024 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree on admission, and the maintainability and transferability of the counter-claim to the Commercial Court under Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court noted that the plaintiff had categorically denied the alleged admission in Ext.A1(a) in his counter affidavit and that the power under Order XII Rule 6 is discretionary.
The judgment is framed as a Reference Order, indicating that significant questions of law arising out of the interplay between Order XII Rule 6 CPC, the maintainability of a counter-claim before a civil court when the dispute is of a commercial nature, and the applicability of Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 required authoritative determination, and the matter was accordingly referred for consideration.
Catchwords:
license deed
permanent prohibitory injunction
counter-claim
mandatory injunction
Order XII Rule 6 CPC
admission
decree on admission
Commercial Courts Act 2015
Section 15(2)
transfer to commercial court
maintainability of counter-claim
discretionary power
reference order
© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain
per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 26, Cited by 0]
Kerala High Court
H. Musthafa vs Abdullakutty Haji on 25 September, 2024
Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Wednesday, the 25th day of September 2024 / 3rd Aswina, 1946
OP(C) NO. 753 OF 2024
OS 206/2023 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT,
PALAKKAD
PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT IN IA/PLAINTIFF IN O.S:
H. MUSTHAFA, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O HUSSAIN, BAITHUL MINAR, NADAKKAVU,
AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD , PIN - 678008
BY ADVS.M/S.MA
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.